Commons:Featured picture candidates
Other featured candidates:
Featured picture candidates ![]() Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures. Old candidates for Featured pictures are listed here. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 and current month. For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Formal thingsNominatingGuidelines for nominatorsPlease read the complete guidelines before nominating. This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documentsThere are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject. Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable. Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself. Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well. Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:
Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced." PhotographsOn the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.
On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.
You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the complete guidelines before nominating. Video and audioPlease nominate videos, sounds, music, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates. Set nominationsIf a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:
Simple tutorial for new usersAdding a new nominationIf you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate image description and licensing, then do the following. Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button. All single files: For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2
All set nomination pages should begin "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/", e.g. "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My Nomination".
Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:
Galleries and FP categories: Please add a gallery page and section heading from the list at Commons FP galleries. Write the code as Page name#Section heading. For example: Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify them using Note: Do not add an 'Alternative' image when you create a nomination. Selecting the best image is part of the nomination process. Alternatives are for a different crop or post-processing of the original image, or a closely related image from the same photo session (limited to 1 per nomination), if they are suggested by voters. VotingEditors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Everybody can vote for their own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed. You may use the following templates:
You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator. A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above. Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:
Remember also to put your signature (~~~~). Featured picture delisting candidatesOver time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:
This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:
If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box: In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:
After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list. As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose. Featured picture candidate policyGeneral rules
Featuring and delisting rulesA candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:
The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5. The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions of the image as well as FPXed and withdrawn nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules. Above all, be politePlease don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care. Happy judging… and remember… all rules can be broken. See also
|
Table of contents
Featured picture candidates
Voting period ends on 12 Mar 2025 at 09:09:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Others
Info A close-in image of HH 30, an edge-on protoplanetary disc around a newly formed star. Many different wavelengths of light are combined and represented by separate and various colours. A dark line across the centre is the disc, corresponding to the densest parts of the disc, made of opaque dust: the star is hidden in here and creates a strong glow in the centre. A band going straight up is a jet, while other outflows above and below the disc, and a tail coming off to one side. created by ESA/Webb, NASA, CSA, Tazaki et al. – uploaded by OptimusPrimeBot – nominated by Redmyname31 -- ツredmyname 💬 09:09, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- ツredmyname 💬 09:09, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- vip (talk) 10:00, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Interesting, but less than 2 Mpixels, too small for FP. Yann (talk) 10:32, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Mar 2025 at 07:23:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Black and White#Building exteriors
Info created by Matthias Süßen , uploaded and nominated by Yann
Support -- Yann (talk) 07:23, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Mar 2025 at 16:11:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture#United_States
Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:11, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:11, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Satisfying composition and magical atmosphere. Cmao20 (talk) 17:46, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --imehling (talk) 19:45, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
Support —Bruce1eetalk 06:27, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Mar 2025 at 16:05:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#United States
Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:05, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:05, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Wow, what a beautiful place Cmao20 (talk) 17:45, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --imehling (talk) 19:45, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Mar 2025 at 13:53:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Spain
Info The Alhambra (Granada, Spain) in sunset light, with the snowy mountains of Sierra Nevada as background. Created, uploaded and nominated by Benjamin Smith -- Benji 13:53, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
Abstain as creator -- Benji 13:53, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
Weak support Beautiful view, building, and composition, but I honestly feel like the noise reduction has gone some way too far and that the details at full size are a bit lacking. A better process from the original RAW files may be possible. Cmao20 (talk) 14:05, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Mar 2025 at 05:39:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery:Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Switzerland
Info Houses above S-charl in a beautiful autumn setting.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:39, 2 March 2025 (UTC)Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:39, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
Support —Bruce1eetalk 07:38, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Pretty. I might crop slightly on the left to remove that bit of another building's roof in the foreground. Cmao20 (talk) 14:03, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
Done. Thank you for your advice.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:52, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 16:26, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 17:36, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --imehling (talk) 19:46, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Mar 2025 at 17:20:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#Germany
Info In my opinion a satisfying composition and striking colours. created by Richard Bartz – uploaded by Richard Bartz – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 17:20, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 17:20, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:21, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Support A little blurry on the right side, but anyway pretty good. --Rbrechko (talk) 16:14, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:04, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --imehling (talk) 19:46, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Mar 2025 at 14:22:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Rail vehicles
Info created by Kabelleger – uploaded by Kabelleger – nominated by Bruce1ee -- —Bruce1eetalk 14:22, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- —Bruce1eetalk 14:22, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:54, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 15:34, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:05, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 20:18, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 15:59, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 16:07, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:03, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 17:33, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
Large Niltava
Voting period ends on 10 Mar 2025 at 01:20:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page
-
Male
-
Female
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Muscicapidae (Old World Flycatchers)
Info Two large and high quality pictures of this bird, one male, one female. No FPs of this species. created by JJ Harrison – uploaded by JJ Harrison – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 01:20, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 01:20, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Really nice. --imehling (talk) 10:01, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 11:22, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:04, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 14:50, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --User:Gioele Serra (talk) 22:17, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Meiræ 22:32, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Schnobby (talk) 07:53, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 08:47, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:03, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 17:33, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Mar 2025 at 18:44:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants
Info created by Kod B – uploaded by Kod B – nominated by Kod B -- Kod B (talk) 18:44, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Kod B (talk) 18:44, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
Support Meiræ 22:32, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
- @Kod B: Please add a gallery above. Yann (talk) 08:45, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Mar 2025 at 14:40:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Ukraine
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Rbrechko -- Rbrechko (talk) 14:40, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Rbrechko (talk) 14:40, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
Support –An insect photographer (talk) 16:36, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose This is going to be a harsh vote because I see what you were thinking here. The light is beautiful and it's a motif that definitely has potential for FP. But I miss an outstanding composition. It feels like the playground items are arranged a little chaotically in the frame, all overlapping one another and with the swing in the background awkwardly cropped, and I don't get a strong compositional idea. All in all, although the light rays are beautiful and nearly made me support, I don't find enough in this picture besides them to vote for it. Cmao20 (talk) 01:24, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Very beautiful light ! --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 18:05, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 17:32, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --imehling (talk) 19:47, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Mar 2025 at 14:04:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Order_:_Lophiiformes_(Anglerfishes)
Info Commerson's frogfish or giant frogfish (Antennarius commerson), Zanzibar, Tanzania. It lives in the tropical and subtropical waters from the Indian Ocean to the eastern coasts of the Pacific Ocean. It can grow to a lengh of up to 38 centimetres (15 in) (like the one on the picture) and its large mouth is prognathous, allowing it to consume prey as large as itself. Its coloration is extremely variable, which they can change in a few weeks as they tend to match their environments. As all frogfishes, A. hispidus is a voracious carnivore which attacks any small animals that pass within range, mainly other fish, but sometimes even congeners. The first dorsal spine, the illicium, is modified for use as a fishing rod. Its extremity is endowed with a characteristic esca (lure), which resembles a small fish or shrimp with a pinkish to brownish coloration. Note: we have no FPs of frogfishes (family Antennariidae), and in fact, only 2 FPs of the whole order Lophiiformes (Anglerfishes). I haven't seen indeed many frogfishes in my life, one in the Philippines and one in Zanzibar. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 14:04, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 14:04, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
Support Interesting subject, good quality for an underwater photo Cmao20 (talk) 14:20, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 16:59, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
Support --imehling (talk) 08:03, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 17:31, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Mar 2025 at 20:19:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Traditions
Info created by Afsalgado – uploaded by Afsalgado – nominated by EUPBR -- EUPBR (talk) 20:19, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
Support -- EUPBR (talk) 20:19, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Mar 2025 at 18:21:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#China
Info created by Philipp Reichmuth – uploaded by Philipp Reichmuth – nominated by Henrysz -- Henrysz (talk) 18:21, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Henrysz (talk) 18:21, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
Oppose interesting view with wow-factor but not fully convinced by the narrow composition and there is some noise and red colour fringing. Cmao20 (talk) 19:26, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
Oppose per Cmao20 and
chromatic aberration or halos at top Ezarateesteban
Oppose: Interesting picture but the angle doesn’t seem right. Also per Esteban the
chromatic aberration is also an issue. Myrealnamm (💬Let's talk · 📜My work) 12:33, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
Alternate version (aberration reduced)
Support I see that people are bothered by the color fringing; here's my best attempt to remove it. What does everyone think Henrysz (talk) 21:17, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Mar 2025 at 18:20:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#North Rhine-Westphalia
Info Representative view of a German low mountain range (Ebbe Mountains,Sauerland in times of climate change: No snow at the end of December. Visible forest damage as a result of dry summers. The image shows the landscape before the changes caused by the construction of numerous wind turbines that are to be built there as part of the energy transition. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 18:20, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Milseburg (talk) 18:20, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
Support Beautiful photo Cmao20 (talk) 19:23, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 02:43, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:37, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:33, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
Support —Bruce1eetalk 06:50, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --imehling (talk) 08:01, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 11:24, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:02, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 17:30, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Especially the fog is beautiful. – Aristeas (talk) 19:48, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Mar 2025 at 18:04:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Spain#Canary Islands
Info all by imehling -- imehling (talk) 18:04, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
Support -- imehling (talk) 18:04, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
Support The composition is convincing me. --Milseburg (talk) 18:22, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
Support per Milseburg Cmao20 (talk) 19:23, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:36, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:36, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 11:25, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Per others. Famberhorst (talk) 17:01, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 17:29, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice composition with the rock, the tree and the cloud. – Aristeas (talk) 19:47, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Mar 2025 at 17:11:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Other portraits
Info created by Antoine Maurin – restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:11, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:11, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 17:34, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 19:22, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
Info There's some hand-written text at the bottom of File:Teresa Brambilla by Antoine Maurin (1845) - Original.jpg - if anyone can read it, it might be very useful to note it down. I'm afraid reading messy cursive in what I think is Italian (though it might be French) is not one of my strong points. Adam Cuerden (talk) 19:41, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, it is Italian, not French. It is half-erased, so difficult to read. Yann (talk) 08:37, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
- Indeed. Something like Al chiarissimo Signor Sch…mann / onore e decoro fra i distinti ar… – Aristeas (talk) 11:05, 1 March 2025 (UTC) The difficult letter in the name looks like a g, but that’s unlikely. It would be intriguing to read Schumann. Is that possible, by any means? – Aristeas (talk) 17:58, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
- I was researching that. Vaguely possible. I almost want to read that last two words as "artisti francesi". Adam Cuerden (talk) 11:42, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
- Indeed. Something like Al chiarissimo Signor Sch…mann / onore e decoro fra i distinti ar… – Aristeas (talk) 11:05, 1 March 2025 (UTC) The difficult letter in the name looks like a g, but that’s unlikely. It would be intriguing to read Schumann. Is that possible, by any means? – Aristeas (talk) 17:58, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Excellent lithograph portrait, excellent restoration. Because the gallery Historical/People is for old portrait photographs, I have taken the liberty to change the gallery link to the section for non-photographic portraits. – Aristeas (talk) 20:01, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:35, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
Support --Schnobby (talk) 15:36, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
Support –An insect photographer (talk) 16:48, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
Support--Famberhorst (talk) 18:39, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 17:28, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Mar 2025 at 05:39:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi#Family : Tricholomataceae
Info Large Clitocybe nebularis under a group of Populus. Focus stack of 22 photos.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:39, 27 February 2025 (UTC)Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:39, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:30, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
Oppose This image is certainly very valuable. I just get no 'wow' from it. Henrysz (talk) 17:59, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
Support The wow for me comes mainly in the detail Cmao20 (talk) 19:22, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Agree with Henrysz Poco a poco (talk) 11:28, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
Support Per Cmao20 --imehling (talk) 07:58, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Oppose In the Category:Clitocybe nebularis in Friesland we already have this featured picture which is better, in my opinion, artistically and educationally, with the stem and fall colors. And that one too, that other one... -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:09, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for your comment. The reason I am offering this photo here is that this Mushroom is much larger than average and that this is a stacked photo with a nicely shaped nose. On the mushroom there is also an imprint of a rained small tree leaf that I removed for the shot so that the imprint became visible. I also like the gradient earth colors.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:52, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
- 4,998 × 3,332 pixels is a smaller resolution than File:Nevelzwam (nebularis) tussen afgevallen beukenblad (d.j.b.) 01.jpg (5,184 × 3,456 pixels). And the enthusiasm for this similar version was very moderate. Thus I don't see the need to promote one more. -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:46, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Per others --Llez (talk) 17:28, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Mar 2025 at 17:42:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
Info created and uploaded by Wojciech Pędzich, nominated by Yann
Support -- Yann (talk) 17:42, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
wow Анастасия Львоваru/en 17:58, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:42, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Too bad that the head and especially the eyes are not sharp--Ermell (talk) 22:04, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
Support Foka – Paulina Anna Studniczka (talk) 11:18, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
Support Henrysz (talk) 18:26, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
Support The head is a little less sharp than the rest of her body but still good for me, plenty of wow-factor Cmao20 (talk) 19:21, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
Support --EUPBR (talk) 20:21, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
Support per Cmao20. And the generous resolution helps in that case. Striking composition with impressive background -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:25, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
Support per Cmao20 and Basile. – Aristeas (talk) 07:58, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 11:28, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 14:41, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:02, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 17:27, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
File:Coat of arms of Trinidad and Tobago.svg (delist and replace)
Voting period ends on 7 Mar 2025 at 15:57:22
Info Reason to reassess: Substantial portions of the image redrawn/revectorised. Proposed to replace with File:Coat of arms of Trinidad and Tobago (1962–2025).svg which now hosts the original nominated file. (Original nomination)
Delist and replace -- HapHaxion (talk / contribs) 15:57, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
Comment If I understand what happened, you substituted the file which was featured with a new version, since the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago introduced a new coat od arms recently. I don't know if this is the correct procedure. Maybe you should have moved the original file to the new name to mantain its history, and then upload the new version. I think we have to wait for the intervention of a mover or that of a sysop. --Harlock81 (talk) 19:41, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
Comment AFAICS Harlock81 is right – we do not need a delist-and-replace nomination, but a disentangling of the versions –, but I hope other people, espec. admins, can shed more light on the best way to deal with this. – Aristeas (talk) 20:05, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
Agree - The file should be moved then global-replaced, not overwritten (with the original uploader's name subsituted) just to avoid the replacement procedure - especially when the picture is a featured one. – Kontributor 2K (talk) 15:27, 1 march 2025 (UTC)
Comment As it stands my initial upload was deleted, and my image added under the existing file of the previous coat of arms, so I'm unable to make the fixes to my file as needed. As it relates to the actual topic of discussion, i thought the file name of the previous arms would just have been changed first then the name of the new arms changed in line after that.--BaronJaguar (talk) 18:56, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Mar 2025 at 15:54:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1940-1949
Info created by unknown – uploaded by Adam Cuerden – nominated by TheFreeWorld -- TheFreeWorld (talk) 15:54, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
Support -- TheFreeWorld (talk) 15:54, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
Support Great photo considering the age Cmao20 (talk) 19:20, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 19:43, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
Support per Cmao20, looks like an impressive film still. – Aristeas (talk) 07:58, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
Support per Cmao20 and Aristeas. – An insect photographer (talk) 11:52, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:33, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
Support --Thi (talk) 22:52, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
Support --imehling (talk) 07:56, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Support Meiræ 22:33, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:59, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 17:26, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Mar 2025 at 14:53:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Poland
Info Staszic Palace, a 17th century church that's been home to various scientific organizations for the last 200 years (currently the Polish Academy of Sciences). That's a sculpture of Copernicus in the foreground by Bertel Thorvaldsen. Panorama. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 14:53, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
Support — Rhododendrites talk | 14:53, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
Support --Milseburg (talk) 17:37, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 19:19, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
Support --EUPBR (talk) 20:21, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
Support Beautiful. I wish the crop on the tree was better. Riad Salih (talk) 13:14, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:32, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 14:45, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 17:26, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Mar 2025 at 14:25:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus_:_Larus
Info Juvenile (first winter) American herring gull (Larus argentatus). all by — Rhododendrites talk | 14:25, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
Support — Rhododendrites talk | 14:25, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 19:25, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:06, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 23:20, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
Support Good, but please add scientific name. --imehling (talk) 17:12, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
Support Good quality, and I like the rusty object which contributes to a harmonius colour palette of browns and greys. – Aristeas (talk) 07:52, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
Support –An insect photographer (talk) 11:48, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:29, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 17:25, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Mar 2025 at 08:57:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family_:_Equidae_(Equids)
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Benjamin Smith -- Benji 08:57, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
Abstain as author -- Benji 08:57, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice catch! --PierreSelim (talk) 11:00, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 11:41, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 12:40, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:49, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 19:24, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 23:19, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 16:43, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
Support --imehling (talk) 17:07, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 17:21, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 20:21, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 01:33, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
Support Appealing mirror image taken from a great viewpoint, pleasant composition and nice mood -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:16, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 11:29, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
Support –An insect photographer (talk) 11:31, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:27, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
Support--Schnobby (talk) 15:39, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:00, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Support--Famberhorst (talk) 18:37, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 17:24, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Mar 2025 at 08:17:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Statues outdoors
Info created by Llez – uploaded by Llez – nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 08:17, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Llez (talk) 08:17, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 23:18, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
Support---Famberhorst (talk) 05:56, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
Support Why not? (There is a faint dust spot directly above the hairdo) --imehling (talk) 17:06, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
Done Thanks for the hint --Llez (talk) 17:47, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 11:30, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:25, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 11:26, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Mar 2025 at 22:57:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#India
Info created, uploaded and nominated by UnpetitproleX -- UnpetitproleX (Talk) 22:57, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
Support Took this picture during a trek/pilgrimage last summer. Digital cameras are not allowed at the lake, so this is the best that could be done.-- UnpetitproleX (Talk) 22:57, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice composition and quality is okay. And nice to see the swastika being used for its original religious meaning, not the perverted fascist meaning. Cmao20 (talk) 01:59, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
- It is extremely common to see Swastikas used for their original religious purpose in India (and Asia in general, I suppose). UnpetitproleX (Talk) 06:28, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
- I've never been to India. The only time I've seen a swastika 'in the wild' is in a Jain shrine that I visited as part of a school project, maybe 12 years ago. I remember that many of my classmates were a little taken aback, but the Jains we encountered were very proud of their symbol and explained that it represented devotion and holiness. I found that very touching. Cmao20 (talk) 07:19, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 08:21, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
Support Good composition, nice mood, interesting site. – Aristeas (talk) 20:20, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:24, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:41, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Mar 2025 at 16:28:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Bones and fossils#Family : Hominidae
Info created by Arabako Arkeologia Museoa – uploaded by Theklan – nominated by Theklan -- Theklan (talk) 16:28, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Theklan (talk) 16:28, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 08:20, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Specially for me.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:54, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
Support – Original and instrutive. An insect photographer (talk) 10:44, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:19, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Nice picture! But we don't know at all what we are looking at. There is no caption in English, no geocoding... It's easy to correct.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Mar 2025 at 15:49:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1890-1899
Info created by Thomas Charles Turner – restored, uploaded, ans nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 15:49, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
Info His nose matches other photos of him. Adam Cuerden (talk) 15:49, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 15:49, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 01:55, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:03, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 08:20, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:50, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 20:17, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:16, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
Support Meiræ 22:34, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Support--Schnobby (talk) 07:57, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Mar 2025 at 11:54:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Machines
Info A new house was built in the neighborhood and the contractor brought in the big toys. A good thing out here in the backwoods is that such sites are not sealed off so I could get close for some photos. The drill and digger looked like two big battling monsters as they were working on flattening the cliff into a level base for the house. All by me, -- Cart (talk) 11:54, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Cart (talk) 11:54, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:59, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:37, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 17:10, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
Weak support I see nothing special in this picture and the bottom-right corner is unsharp a bit, but I like the composition and the story too :) -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:00, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
Weak support per Ekaterina. --A.Savin 23:07, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
Comment Like Екатерина Борисова and A.Savin, I see nothing special in this picture, but in my view it's also a cluttered composition. The house behind the engines, and one engine behind the other, a black car hidden behind a big rock, a blue vehicle at the right... Moreover, these two machines seem more busy each with their own task, close to the ground, than "fighting" in the situation. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:40, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
Oppose The big amont of rocks at the foreground doesn't work for me. I don't see the WOW factor here. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 07:48, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
Oppose I agree Poco a poco (talk) 10:07, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:42, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
Support With a little imagination you can see that the two machines crossed swords.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:54, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
Oppose per others --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:09, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Oppose No wow, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:25, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 10:36, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Mar 2025 at 12:27:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals#Class_:_Anthozoa
Info Coral (Leptoria phrygia), Zanzibar, Tanzania. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 12:27, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 12:27, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 21:11, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Support –Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 05:45, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Too much of the picture is unsharp in my view. Sorry. --imehling (talk) 07:53, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for your feedback. IMHO there is no way to get everything sharp for this kind of shot. It's a macro shot, to get this level of detail you have to get close to it and so you cannot expect that areas away from the center gets the same level of detail. Poco a poco (talk) 11:17, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
- You might want to give more information: how big is this? From how far did you take it? Yann (talk) 12:15, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
- The width of the snakeshaped coral formation is 2 millimetres (0.079 in). Does it help? Poco a poco (talk) 18:59, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
Support Yes, certainly. Seeing the small size, this is very good. You should add this in the description. Yann (talk) 16:05, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:42, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
Support per Yann. – Aristeas (talk) 20:16, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
Result: 6 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
File:Etang du Pla de la Font 06.jpg, not featured
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Mar 2025 at 06:50:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/France#Ariège
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 06:50, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 06:50, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Support Unusual and beautiful composition. I love the purple flowers. Cmao20 (talk) 21:09, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Certainly a wonderful place to visit, but photographically I miss a special composition or an exceptional light. Dull background and midday hues, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:58, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
Support I like the mood of the picture. The flowers and reflections are very nice. --imehling (talk) 07:52, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 08:37, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 09:14, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Per Basile Poco a poco (talk) 10:10, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
Result: 4 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
Timetable (day 5 after nomination)
Wed 26 Feb → Mon 03 Mar Thu 27 Feb → Tue 04 Mar Fri 28 Feb → Wed 05 Mar Sat 01 Mar → Thu 06 Mar Sun 02 Mar → Fri 07 Mar Mon 03 Mar → Sat 08 Mar
Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting)
Sat 22 Feb → Mon 03 Mar Sun 23 Feb → Tue 04 Mar Mon 24 Feb → Wed 05 Mar Tue 25 Feb → Thu 06 Mar Wed 26 Feb → Fri 07 Mar Thu 27 Feb → Sat 08 Mar Fri 28 Feb → Sun 09 Mar Sat 01 Mar → Mon 10 Mar Sun 02 Mar → Tue 11 Mar Mon 03 Mar → Wed 12 Mar
Closing a featured picture promotion request
The bot
Note that the description below is for manual closure, this is mostly not needed anymore as there exists a bot (FPCBot) that counts the votes and handles the process below. However after the bot has counted the votes a manual review step is used to make sure the count is correct before the bot again picks up the work.
Manual procedure
Any experienced user may close requests.
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Bridge (August 2013).jpg). See also {{FPC-results-reviewed}}.
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=("yes" or "no")|gallery=xxx (leave blank if "featured=no")|sig=~~~~}} - Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
featured or not featured
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured === - Save your edit.
- If it is featured:
- Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
- Also add the picture to the appropriate gallery and section of Commons:Featured pictures, list. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images. An image should only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.
- Add the template {{Assessments|featured=1}} to the image description page.
- If it was an alternative image, use the subpage/com-nom parameter: For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use {{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}}
- If the image is already featured on another wikipedia, just add featured=1 to the Assessments template. For instance {{Assessments|enwiki=1}} becomes {{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
- Add the picture to the chronological list of featured pictures. Put it in the gallery using this format: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- The # should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other noms on that page for examples.
- You may simplify this if multiple things were done by the same user. E.g.: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created, uploaded, and nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- Add == FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the Talk Page of the nominator.
- As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including {{FPX}}ed, {{FPD}}ed and withdrawn nominations), open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you've just finished closing. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/March 2025), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.
Closing a delisting request
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
'''Result:''' x delist, x keep, x neutral => /not/ delisted. ~~~~
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/Image:Astrolabe-Persian-18C.jpg) - Also edit the title of the delisting candidate image template and add after the image tag
delisted or not delisted
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] === becomes === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted === - Move the actual template from Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list to the bottom of the actual month page on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/March 2025.
- If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
- Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
- Edit the picture's description as follows:
- Replace the template {{Featured picture}} on the image description page by {{Delisted picture}}. If using the {{Assessments}} template, change featured=1 to featured=2 (do not change anything related to its status in other featured picture processes).
- Remove the image from all categories beginning with "Featured [pictures]" (example: Featured night photography, Featured pictures from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, Featured pictures of Paris).
- Remove the "Commons quality assessment" claim (d:Property:P6731) "Wikimedia Commons featured picture" from the picture's Structured data.
- Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in chronological list of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1-6) with (1-6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture in the gallery is not removed.
- If this is a Delist and Replace, the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the above section. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.
Manual archiving of a withdrawn nomination
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
In the occasion that the FPCbot will not mark withdrawn nominations with a "to be reviewed" template and put them in Category:Featured picture candidates awaiting closure review just like if they were on the usual list, put the following "no" template:
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=X|oppose=X|neutral=X|featured=no|gallery=|sig=--~~~~}} - Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
not featured
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], not featured === - Save your edit.
- Open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/March 2025), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.