Commons:Valued image candidates

Skip to image nominations

Skip to most valued reviews

Skip to set nominations

These are the candidates to become valued images. Please note that this is not the same as featured pictures or quality images. If you simply want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at photography critiques.

Single images can be proposed for valued image (VI) status. Candidates must be proposed as being the most valuable of all Commons' images within a specified scope. Judging is carried out according to the valued image criteria.

A Most Valued Review (MVR) is opened where there are two or more candidates competing within essentially the same scope.

The rules for promotion can be found at Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules.

An image which has previously been declined can be renominated within the same scope only if the issues leading to the original decline have been addressed. Previously nominated images that were closed as "undecided" can be renominated at any time. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR.

If you would like to nominate an image for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

Valued Image links:

How to nominate an image for VI status

Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination.

Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review.

Adding a new nomination (image)

Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button.

Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage.

Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:

|My-image-filename.jpg

so that it looks like this:

{{VICs
 ...
 |My-image-filename.jpg
}}

and save the candidate list.

Renomination

Declined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review.

Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination.

Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination.

Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in

|date={{subst:VI-time}}

Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review).

Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with

|nominator=~~~

Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure.

Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}")
replace the review parameter with

|review=
{{subst:VIC-archive}}
}}

Save the page.
There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews.
Save the previous reviews archive page

Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list.

How to open a Most Valued Review

There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist, but with status set to "discussed". Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list:

=== Scope ===
{{VICs
  |candidate1.jpg
  |candidate2.jpg
}}

where Scope is the scope of both images, and candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates

If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR.

The status parameter of each candidate should remain set to "discussed" while the MVR is ongoing.

How to review the candidates

How to review an image

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.

Review procedure

On the review page the image is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
- If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
- If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:

You type	You get	When
`*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~`	Comment My comment. -- Example	You have a comment.
`*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~`	Info My information. -- Example	You have information.
`*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~`	Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Example	You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
`*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~`	Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Example	You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
`*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~`	Question My question. -- Example	You have a question.
`*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~`	Support Reason for supporting. -- Example	You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.

If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.

Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.

Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
- status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
- status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
- status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
- status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).

Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

Changes in scope during the review period

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.

You can submit new nominations starting on COM:VIC.

Pending valued image candidates

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

58,072 closed valued image candidates
Closed as		Nominations
Promoted	52,315 (90.1%)
Undecided	3,224 (5.6%)
Declined	2,533 (4.4%)

New valued image nominations

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by: Shaan Sengupta^Talk on 2025-02-26 06:06 (UTC)
Scope: Category:Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan
Reason: Best portrait and most in use -- Shaan Sengupta^Talk
Open for review.

View promotion
Nominated by: Ercé (talk) on 2025-02-26 09:48 (UTC)
Scope: Rhinolophus ferrumequinum skulls (skull of greater horseshoe bat)
Support Useful and used —Nikride (talk) 11:51, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply] Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by: ツredmyname ^💬 on 2025-02-26 10:51 (UTC)
Scope: Margaret Qualley
Previous reviews ... The latest review follows here
Open for review.

View promotion
Nominated by: Rbrechko (talk) on 2025-02-26 12:50 (UTC)
Scope: Church of the Annunciation, Vilkhivtsi, Ukraine, view from NW.
Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:07, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply] Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by: Rbrechko (talk) on 2025-02-26 12:53 (UTC)
Scope: House on Independence Square 10, Pidhaitsi, Ukraine.
Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply] Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by: Pierre André ^(talk) on 2025-02-26 21:17 (UTC)
Scope: Voronet Monastery's Church - Southern view and courtyard detail, Gura Humorului (Ro)
Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply] Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-02-27 05:54 (UTC)
Scope: Paintings by Guercino in Venice - Philosopher with book - Pinacotheque Egidio Martini
Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 06:32, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply] Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-02-27 05:55 (UTC)
Scope: ''Solidago canadensis'' 'Little lemon' - Inflorescence
Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 06:33, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply] Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-02-27 05:57 (UTC)
Scope: Prosantorhinus douvillei - Right jaw
Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 06:34, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply] Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Llez (talk) on 2025-02-27 06:30 (UTC)
Scope: Isognomon ephippium (Saddle Tree Oyster), left valve
Support Useful and used —Nikride (talk) 07:23, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 12:42, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Nikride (talk) on 2025-02-27 07:21 (UTC)
Scope: Group of graves of Soviet soldiers in Kryvchunka
Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 12:42, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Nikride (talk) on 2025-02-27 07:21 (UTC)
Scope: Monument to Soviet soldiers-countrymen in Kryvchunka
Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 12:42, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Ercé (talk) on 2025-02-27 08:41 (UTC)
Scope: Mustela nivalis bones (Skull of least weasel)
Support Useful and used —Nikride (talk) 12:33, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 12:42, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Pierre André ^(talk) on 2025-02-27 09:48 (UTC)
Scope: *The World (Major Arcana N°21), in Visconti Sforza* tarot, own scan**
Best in Scope--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:46, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 12:42, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by: Kelly zhrm (talk) on 2025-02-27 10:48 (UTC)
Scope: 20 Italian lira coins (1902–1908) - Italy
Comment image should be geocoded. --Pierre André ^(talk) 16:58, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Gzen92 (talk) on 2025-02-27 13:30 (UTC)
Scope: Grotte de Lourdes à Still (Bas-Rhin)
Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2025-02-27 17:49 (UTC)
Scope: Detail of the bow of Motortankschip WESTLANDGRACHT. ENI 02104853, Port side.
Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-02-28 05:58 (UTC)
Scope: Scene with women on horseback in a farmhouse by Giuseppe Bernardino Bison - Pinacoteca Egidio Martini
Support Useful and used --Pierre André ^(talk) 16:54, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-02-28 05:59 (UTC)
Scope: Tobiolo e l'Angelo - Domenico Zampieri detto il Domenichino - Museo civico di Santa Caterina
Support Useful and used —Nikride (talk) 06:47, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-02-28 06:01 (UTC)
Scope: Le docteur Robert Le Masle by Suzanne Valadon, Centre Pompidou
Support Useful and used —Nikride (talk) 06:49, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Llez (talk) on 2025-02-28 06:03 (UTC)
Scope: Chama punctata, right valve
Support Useful and used —Nikride (talk) 06:43, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Nikride (talk) on 2025-02-28 06:36 (UTC)
Scope: Monument to Soviet soldiers-countrymen in Lemishchykha
Support Useful and used. --Rbrechko (talk) 14:05, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Nikride (talk) on 2025-02-28 06:39 (UTC)
Scope: Group of graves of Soviet soldiers in Lytvynivka (Uman Raion)
Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:20, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Rbrechko (talk) on 2025-02-28 14:03 (UTC)
Scope: House on Independence Square 7, Pidhaitsi, Ukraine.
Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:21, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Rbrechko (talk) on 2025-02-28 14:08 (UTC)
Scope: Bell tower of the church of the Nativity of the Theotokos, Ruda, Ukraine.
Support Useful and used —Nikride (talk) 15:11, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Pierre André ^(talk) on 2025-02-28 17:10 (UTC)
Scope: Dodgers Clubhouse at Universal CityWalk Hollywood, view from Universal City Plaza, Los Angeles (CA)
Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:22, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Pierre André ^(talk) on 2025-02-28 21:59 (UTC)
Scope: Saint-Géry'Church in Aubechies view from 'Espa. Pierre Descamps', Beloeil (Be)
Used in: Global usage
Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:58, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Llez (talk) on 2025-03-01 06:00 (UTC)
Scope: Mastonia algens, shell
Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:23, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-03-01 07:11 (UTC)
Scope: David with the head of Goliath by Johann Carl Loth - Museo civico di Santa Caterina - Treviso
Support Useful and used —Nikride (talk) 07:44, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-03-01 07:14 (UTC)
Scope: Ampelomeryx ginsburgi - Skull top view
Best in Scope --Pierre André ^(talk) 11:55, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-03-01 07:16 (UTC)
Scope: Portrait de Madame Lily Walton by Suzanne Valadon, Centre Pompidou
Support Useful and used —Nikride (talk) 07:43, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Nikride (talk) on 2025-03-01 07:39 (UTC)
Scope: Monument to Soviet soldiers-countrymen in Lytvynivka (Uman Raion)
Support Useful and used --Pierre André ^(talk) 11:52, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Nikride (talk) on 2025-03-01 07:40 (UTC)
Scope: Mass grave of Soviet soldiers in Mariika
Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:58, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Pierre André ^(talk) on 2025-03-01 11:49 (UTC)
Scope: Former town hall, place Albert 1er (Bléharies), (Be)
Best in Scope--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:16, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Kelly zhrm (talk) on 2025-03-01 13:34 (UTC)
Scope: Dr. Eduardo San Giovanni (1906) by William Merritt Chase
Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Kelly zhrm (talk) on 2025-03-01 13:38 (UTC)
Scope: Drawing, Head of a Bearded Man, 1872–78 by William Merritt Chase
Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Kelly zhrm (talk) on 2025-03-01 13:43 (UTC)
Scope: Venetian Lace Making by William Merritt Chase
Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:26, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Rbrechko (talk) on 2025-03-01 14:44 (UTC)
Scope: Bell tower of Saint Michael church, Nehrovets, Ukraine, view from NW.
Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 16:34, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Alexander-93 (talk) on 2025-03-01 16:30 (UTC)
Scope: Mercedes-Benz W213 Facelift - left front view
Used in: an:Segmento E, de:Mercedes-Benz-Pkw, de:Mercedes-Benz Baureihe 213, fi:Mercedes-Benz E-sarja (W213), gl:Lista de vehículos de Mercedes-Benz, id:Segmen E, ja:Eセグメント, uk:Mercedes-Benz, uk:Mercedes-Benz W213
Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Alexander-93 (talk) on 2025-03-01 16:32 (UTC)
Scope: Karmann K2 - left front view
Used in: de:BMW Compact
Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Alexander-93 (talk) on 2025-03-01 16:33 (UTC)
Scope: BMW 502 Sportwagen - left front view
Used in: de:BMW 503, de:Konzeptfahrzeuge von BMW
Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:26, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-03-02 05:39 (UTC)
Scope: Landscape with knight and shepherdesses by Francesco Zuccarelli - Pinacotheque Egidio Martini
Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:11, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-03-02 05:50 (UTC)
Scope: Plesiaceratherium mirallesi - Skull (ventral view)
Question is this a ventral view? Then I think it should be mentioned in the scope --Llez (talk) 06:30, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply] Comment Oops exact thanks --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:05, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply] Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 17:22, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-03-02 05:51 (UTC)
Scope: Salvia guaranitica 'Purple and Bloom' - inflorescences
Support Useful and used —Nikride (talk) 08:56, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Llez (talk) on 2025-03-02 06:25 (UTC)
Scope: Conus gloriamaris, shell
Support Useful and used —Nikride (talk) 08:54, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Alexander-93 (talk) on 2025-03-02 08:02 (UTC)
Scope: Karmann K2 - left rear view
Used in: de:Karmann, de:BMW Compact
Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:26, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by: Alexander-93 (talk) on 2025-03-02 08:03 (UTC)
Scope: BMW 502 Sportwagen - right rear view
Used in: de:BMW 503
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by: Alexander-93 (talk) on 2025-03-02 08:02 (UTC)
Scope: BMW M3 (E46) Touring - left front view
Used in: de:Konzeptfahrzeuge von BMW
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Nikride (talk) on 2025-03-02 08:51 (UTC)
Scope: Mass grave of 17 Soviet soldiers in Meduvata
Support Useful and used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:31, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Nikride (talk) on 2025-03-02 08:52 (UTC)
Scope: Mass grave of Soviet soldiers in Meduvata
Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:27, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Ercé (talk) on 2025-03-02 08:54 (UTC)
Scope: Apodemus sylvaticus anatomy (wood mouse)
Support Useful and used —Nikride (talk) 08:57, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on Sur En-Sent, gemeente Scuol. 17-10-2024. (actm.) 13.jpg
Scope: Sculptures Sur En, Sent. Riverofcourage. Artwork by Andreas Hover.
Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. Expression error: Unexpected < operator.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Rbrechko (talk) on 2025-03-02 21:32 (UTC)
Scope: Church of the Dormition, Velyki Hlibovychi, Ukraine, view from NW.
Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:31, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Rbrechko (talk) on 2025-03-02 21:34 (UTC)
Scope: Bell tower of the church of the Dormition, Velyki Hlibovychi, Ukraine.
Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:32, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Pierre André ^(talk) on 2025-03-02 23:03 (UTC)
Scope: Grande Chapelle 'spire of the free Institution in Marcq-en-Barœul.- Nord, view from Allée des Magnolias
Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:32, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by: Sebring12Hrs (talk) on 2025-03-03 02:21 (UTC)
Scope: Hôtel de Cébié, Aurillac (façade)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Llez (talk) on 2025-03-03 06:17 (UTC)
Scope: Callistocypraea aurantium (Golden Cowrie), shell
Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:33, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-03-03 06:14 (UTC)
Scope: Hispanotherium beonense (Holotype) – Skull
Support Useful and used —Nikride (talk) 06:35, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-03-03 06:17 (UTC)
Scope: Crucifix from women's Dominican Convent of St Paul, Treviso - Museo civico
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2025-03-03 06:20 (UTC)
Scope: Geranium wallichianum 'Bloom Me Away' - Flowers
Support Useful and used —Nikride (talk) 06:34, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by: Nikride (talk) on 2025-03-03 06:31 (UTC)
Scope: Monument to Soviet soldiers-countrymen in Oleksandrivka (Uman Raion)
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by: Nikride (talk) on 2025-03-03 06:31 (UTC)
Scope: Mass graves of Soviet and Czechoslovak soldiers in Ostrozhany
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by: Pierre André ^(talk) on 2025-03-03 11:32 (UTC)
Scope: Stained glass window representing the marriage of Joseph and Mary, in Saint-Vincent's church.- Marcq-en-Barœul.- Nord
Open for review.

Pending Most valued review candidates

Jujubinus errinae

hamster

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Llez (talk) on 2011-12-10 22:24 (UTC)
Scope: Cricetus cricetus (European Hamster)
Support Excellent. All criteria met.--Jetstreamer (talk) 01:46, 11 December 2011 (UTC) Support Seems to be the best one Kersti (talk) 17:13, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply] `Result: 2 support, 0 oppose => promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:32, 28 December 2011 (UTC)`[reply]
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 12:42, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by: Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2025-01-04 16:28 (UTC)
Scope: Cricetus cricetus (European hamster)
Reason: replacing image of museum specimen -- Charlesjsharp (talk)
Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:01, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply] Support Proposed image is definitely the better VI of the two. While this one shows the paws a little better, proposed image has better overall quality and more valuable. --GRDN711 (talk) 16:36, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 12:42, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

To initiate a most valued review, please go to the dedicated MVR sub page.

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

All open candidates in an MVR have to have their status set as "discussed" while the review is ongoing. Only when all candidates are due for closure can the MVR be closed.

Refer to Most valued review, the promotion rules and the instructions for closure for details.

Pending valued image set candidates

This section has been deactivated because of technical issues. Please do not add any VI set candidate.