User talk:JWilz12345

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, JWilz12345!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 12:43, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

04:01 ^[update]

Commons clock - made from this set ^[update]

Userboxes

This user's timezone is UTC+8.

This user respects copyright, but sometimes it can be a major pain.

This user is a license reviewer on Wikimedia Commons. (verify)

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4

DR categories, a question

Hello, I got your friendly reminder. Will try to honour it! But I'd like to inquire about your opinion on how to categorize DR that are based upon more than the FOP rationale. An example can be seen here: Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Cinépolis Salvador Norte, where there are also scope-related issues claimed. Sometimes, I also make mass DR where I did not separate the nominee lists with section titles, only by plain text in the nomination (writing something like, in summary, "Files X Y Z should be deleted because FOP, file A because EDUSE"). What about these requests? Do you think that they should also go into the pending FOP cases? Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 07:42, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Grand-Duc you can categorize them in multiple categories. There is also Category:Scope-related deletion requests/deleted. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 07:51, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Aye. I already began to add the applicable categories myself on new DR. But I'm still pondering something: is a "kept" cat really sensible on cases like this one, Commons:Deletion requests/File:華盛頓高中高中部夏季制服.jpg? If the purpose of FOP DR cats is to keep track of images that can be restored should the legislation change, then using the deletedcategories would make more sense when the DR's outcome is a revision deletion, even if the file itself prevails in a cropped form. Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 02:04, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Grand-Duc best to discuss it at COM:VP. This needs more opinions from other users, and there should be some standard in FoP categorization for such case. It appears that at least one more user has the same opinion as yours. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 04:49, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kibawe welcome sign (Maut Sky pic) - Flickr.jpg

File:Kibawe welcome sign (Maut Sky pic) - Flickr.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 08:32, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:DaliMuseum1.jpg

Hi, JWilz12345. I don’t think this qualifies as a Spanish FOP case because the statue is located in an interior courtyard beyond the museum entrance, in other words in a place with restricted access and not in a public place, properly speaking—unlike, say the Monument to Francesc Pujols, which is located in a public square outside the museum. —Rrburke (talk) 15:26, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Rrburke no, it is qualifiable under FoP case category. All deletion requests concerning public art are rightfully FoP cases, even if the FoP rules of each country do not cover works depicted in the nominated images. We have been categorizing DRs concerning Spanish indoor works under that category, like: Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Blaugrana.JPG (categorized under Spanish FoP case way back 2012, during the time I wasn't yet a user here on Wikimedia-world). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 15:41, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, JWilz12345. Thanks for your reply. Help me out, because I don’t immediately see how La Reina Esther qualifies as public art, since it’s located inside a private museum you have to pay to gain admission to, unlike the Pujols monument that's located in the public square outside the museum and which the general public has access to. The museum's website says explicitly:

La comunicació pública de les imatges preses a l'interior dels museus Dalí estan subjectes a llicència d'ús i liquidació de drets

Rrburke (talk) 18:45, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Rrburke: . I apologize, I cannot comment on the situation of those museum artworks, perhaps other users may be of help. Regards, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 01:42, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Mendiola Peace Arch (C.M. Recto Ave. Cor. Legarda, Sampaloc And San Miguel, Manila; 2014-11-03) 02.jpg

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contributions) 19:19, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]